Jazz loses in disposable camera case with Fuji
In the exhaustion argument, Jazz relied on Chevron v. Huson, 404 US 97 (1971), for prospective-only application.
The issue of substantial evidence came up, and the case of BJ Servs. v. Halliburton, 156 F3d 1182, was cited.
Jazz, represented by Budd Larner, lost on all legal issues as the judgment of the district court was affirmed.