Appellants win reversal of obviousness rejections in Ex parte Street
Street, represented by MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP, won reversal of three obviousness rejections.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 5:57 AM
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- "Intended purpose" does not limit claim
- Goodyear loses appeal of obviousness rejection in ...
- A123 battery company being bought by Chinese Wanxiang
- CAT loses before CAFC
- On blaming graduate students for plagiarism
- "The Mentalist" does intellectual property on 9 De...
- "60 Minutes" on December 9, 2012
- Sunday Morning on December 9, 2012
- Patent to issue on -- Methods and Systems for Chem...
- Newspaper articles as 102(b) art in In re Ditto
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home