Duopross v. Inviro: an exclamation point and puffery in trademark law
In Duopross v. Inviro, the CAFC reversed a decision of the TTAB.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 3:44 PM
Tuesday, August 14, 2012
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- MIT patent invalid for lack of enablement
- Apple's US 8,243,027: Touch screen liquid crystal...
- Edward Jay Epstein clueless on Zakaria matter
- Electrofuels
- Harvard Magazine discusses Zakaria plagiarism
- "60 Minutes" on August 12, 2012
- "It was a take-it-or-leave-it proposition"
- Apple warned Samsung about patent infringement in ...
- Plagiarism problems at UMissouri med school
- George Griswold Frelinghuysen: patent lawyer and ...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home