Mixed result at CAFC in GAYMAR INDUSTRIES case

The CAFC noted:



In assessing the totality of the circumstances,
the district court relied on several instances of
defendant CSZ’s purported litigation misconduct
as a basis for finding that the case was not exceptional.
We affirm the district court’s finding of a lack
of objective baselessness.
We reverse the exceptional case finding
insofar as it was
based on CSZ’s
purported
misconduct, and remand.



link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-1174.Opinion.6-23-2015.1.PDF