Note the text:
See, e.g., In re Inland Steel Co., 265F.3d 1354, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2001)
(“The fact that [a prior art reference] teaches that [a second step] in addition to [a
first step] produces optimal results does not negate [the
reference's] additional teaching that [the first step] is
effective even in [the absence of the second step.]”
link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-1804.Opinion.5-7-2015.1.PDF
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home