PTAB reverses obviousness rejection in Ex parte Nakamura
The combined art failed to teach a claim element and the obviousness rejection was reversed.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 6:16 AM
Saturday, April 18, 2015
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- PTAB affirms examiner in Ex parte Mabey
- PTAB determines interference as to US 7,329,499
- PTAB affirms examiner in Ex parte Lockwood concern...
- Article in the New York Times wrongly credits Bell...
- Ineos loses at CAFC in appeal of adverse summary j...
- Open records law beats trade secrets in Georgia pi...
- In Detroit, Paul Glomski tells Michelle Lee: They'...
- CAFC affirms PTAB in IPRs related to BELDEN INC . ...
- The CAFC does cacti in the Trivita case
- Using fluorescence microscopy to distinguish ethan...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home