Mandamus denied by CAFC in IN RE FUJITSU LIMITED AND FUJITSU NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. but granted in Google case

The CAFC noted:



In seeking a writ of mandamus, petitioners must es-
tablish a “clear and indisputable” right to relief and
that they “lack adequate alternative means to obtain the
relief” they seek. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S.
367, 380-81 (2004)



link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-155.Order.10-7-2014.1.PDF

But note that the Cheney case was also cited in the Google case (2014-147 ), wherein
the CAFC granted mandamus.

link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-147.Order.10-9-2014.1.PDF

See also Google finally wrests Rockstar patent suit out of East Texas