PTAB affirms 102(f) rejection in Ex parte Munro
An odd argument by applicants resulted in an affirmed 102(f) rejection in Ex parte Munro
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 5:58 PM
Thursday, April 03, 2014
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Samsung accuses Apple of not practising patents; p...
- A patent on all flying machines?
- CAFC grants mandamus in In re Toyota Motors
- Partnership for American Innovation
- CAFC affirms SJ of invalidity of design patent in ...
- Senju loses on claim preclusion
- Alice going to lose in CLS case?
- RIKEN investigation confirms Obokata paper on st...
- Forbes terms Apple/Samsung patent litigation as bo...
- 60 Minutes on March 30, 2014
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home