CAFC affirms SJ of invalidity of design patent in MRC v. Hunter
One accused infringer (Hunter) was a former customer of the patentee.
MRC filed suit against both Hunter and CDI for wiliful infringement of
both patents. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Hunter and CDI on the
grounds that both patents are invalid as obvious under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a). MRC Innovations, Inc. v. Hunter Mfg., LLP, 921 F. Supp. 2d 800, 812 (N.D. Ohio 2013).