PTAB brings up KSR automaton in Ex parte Sabic
Within Ex parte Sabic , PTAB asserted that appellant reduced the man of ordinary skill to an automaton, counter to what KSR states.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 8:04 AM
Friday, January 10, 2014
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Examiner reversed by PTAB in Ex parte Gadkaree
- Mostly a loss for appellant in IPPISCH
- CAFC in Pacific Coast v. Malibu: the principles o...
- Inter partes Reexamination 95/001,567 concerning U...
- Appellant loses in Ex parte Nicol
- Appellant wins on obviousness in Ex parte Frazer; ...
- Ex parte Gross on the use of and/or in claims
- Intervenor Motorola loses on motion at CAFC in Mic...
- Followup on "The Cleantech Crash"
- "The Good Wife" does copyright in "Goliath and Dav...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home