Mostly a loss for appellant in IPPISCH

from Ex parte IPPISCH


In re De Blauwe , 736 F.2d 699, 705 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
(Arguments and conclusions unsupported by factual evidence carry no
evidentiary weight.)



The outcome


we affirm the rejection of claims 19 and 38 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Donofrio, Deng, and Hartley. Pursuant
to 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1), we also affirm the rejection of claims 20, 23, 25,
26, 28-31, 33, 34, and 39-41 as these
claims were not argued separately.
We affirm the rejection of claims 24 and 32 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as obvious over Donofrio, Deng, Hartley, and Eggers.
We affirm the rejection of claim 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
obvious over Donofrio, Deng,
Hartley, and Konstorum.
We affirm the rejection of claim 35 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
obvious over Hara, Donofrio, and Deng.
We reverse the rejection of claims 36, 37, and 42 under 35 U.S.C. §
103(a) as obvious over Hara, Donofrio, and Deng.