Examiner misidentifies elements in figures; chocolate molder wins
See Ex parte Paul
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 4:50 PM
Monday, July 08, 2013
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Appellant in Ex parte Furlong wins on obviousness ...
- Ex parte Islam: don't import limitations from the...
- Buyouts at the Bayou
- CBS Sunday Morning for July 7, 2013
- Buckyball, reprised
- The Tipsy Coachman Rule
- Applicant defined term analyzed under Sunrace in E...
- Translation issue in Ex parte LOSCH?
- On the effective use of a reply brief
- Appellant loses in Ex parte HERBACH
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home