Applicant defined term analyzed under Sunrace in Ex parte Beck
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 7:03 AM
Wednesday, July 03, 2013
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Translation issue in Ex parte LOSCH?
- On the effective use of a reply brief
- Appellant loses in Ex parte HERBACH
- Appellant loses in Ex parte ROKUI
- Appellant loses in Ex parte Yokota. In re Best is...
- On the meaning of "a"
- 101 issue arises in Ex parte Connell
- Applicants lose in Ex parte Harris
- Filing an RCE withdraws an appeal
- Convolve/MIT lose on trade secret issue at CAFC
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home