More in Middleton v. Minnesota Mining
Of the case Middleton v. Minnesota Mining, with some history here, the CAFC issued a affirmed a judgment on 21 Feb. 2013.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 5:16 PM
Thursday, February 21, 2013
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Is Proterro the only company making sucrose photos...
- Supreme Court decides Gunn v. Minton
- CAFC does doctrine of equivalents in Brilliant Ins...
- Calculations fail in Ex parte Trosman
- KSR kills off archery bow claims
- Getting a patent by omitting an element from a pri...
- Board says "reasonable expectation of success" par...
- CBS "60 Minutes" on February 17, 2013
- CBS Sunday Morning for February 17, 2013
- Impax loses at CAFC in AMRIX case
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home