BPAI says wikipedia found to be unreliable
In Ex parte Ki
Wikipedia has been found to be an unreliable source of information, citing Techradium v. Blackboard, 2009 WL 1152985 (ED Texas) AND
Budasa v. Mukasey, 540 F.3d 909 (CA8 2008 )
In re Schulze,346 F.2d 600, 602 (CCPA 1965) , is cited for attorney argument not taking the place of evidence.
Keller, 642 F.2d at 425, is cited for the proposition of what the combined references would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art.
In re van Geuns, 988 F.2d at 1184, is cited for not reading limitations from the specification into the claims.
DePuy Spine v. Medtronic. 567 F.3d at 1327, is cited for teaching away.
cross-reference: Applicant admitted prior art [AAPA]
Wikipedia has been found to be an unreliable source of information, citing Techradium v. Blackboard, 2009 WL 1152985 (ED Texas) AND
Budasa v. Mukasey, 540 F.3d 909 (CA8 2008 )
In re Schulze,346 F.2d 600, 602 (CCPA 1965) , is cited for attorney argument not taking the place of evidence.
Keller, 642 F.2d at 425, is cited for the proposition of what the combined references would have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art.
In re van Geuns, 988 F.2d at 1184, is cited for not reading limitations from the specification into the claims.
DePuy Spine v. Medtronic. 567 F.3d at 1327, is cited for teaching away.
cross-reference: Applicant admitted prior art [AAPA]
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 10:39 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home