The complexities of interference
See the CAFC ruling in Loughlin v. Ling, related to interference 105,766.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 8:36 AM
Thursday, September 08, 2011
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Patent reform 2011: the final stretch?
- Trademark issue at outlet malls
- Patent reform 2011: job exporters ahead of the jo...
- The final eight in the Biofuels Digest voting
- Dalhousie University dumps turnitin
- "60 Minutes" on September 4, 2011: recycled stories
- "Sunday Morning" on Sept. 4, 2011: Eastman's pate...
- Hynix' request to file amicus brief denied in Ramb...
- Did the Connell case create a bright line rule, th...
- UNC prof who missed McAdoo plagiarism had law degr...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home