"Judicial hellholes"?
IPBiz found a post at lawbeat of interest. It began:
The junk science on display in the American Tort Reform Association's annual "judicial hellhole" study -- remember, Adam Liptak documented how the rankings are meaningless because the underlying survey has no actual validity, which ATRA cheerfully admitted -- now propagates itself on Forbes.com.
IPBiz could not help but think how the "junk science" of the "97% patent grant rate" worked its way through the IP legal academic community. Does that make the IP legal academic community an "academic hellhole"?
The junk science on display in the American Tort Reform Association's annual "judicial hellhole" study -- remember, Adam Liptak documented how the rankings are meaningless because the underlying survey has no actual validity, which ATRA cheerfully admitted -- now propagates itself on Forbes.com.
IPBiz could not help but think how the "junk science" of the "97% patent grant rate" worked its way through the IP legal academic community. Does that make the IP legal academic community an "academic hellhole"?
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 10:38 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home