Lemley/Moore on "Ending Abuse..."
IPBiz got a chuckle over a thread on patently-o about the Lemley/Moore law review article "Ending Abuse..." One wonders where all these commenters have been for the last three years?
To this day, Lemley and Moore never corrected the false statement they made about Robert Clarke (that's "George" Clarke to readers of Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents).
In its comments on proposed rules changes on continuing applications, the USPTO cited the wrong page of the Lemley and Moore article.
See articles in Kent-JIP and
www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/comments/fpp_continuation/ebert2.pdf
To this day, Lemley and Moore never corrected the false statement they made about Robert Clarke (that's "George" Clarke to readers of Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents).
In its comments on proposed rules changes on continuing applications, the USPTO cited the wrong page of the Lemley and Moore article.
See articles in Kent-JIP and
www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/comments/fpp_continuation/ebert2.pdf
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 5:21 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home