Google search on "patent reform", 2795
As 2005 winds down, a search on Google for +"patent reform" +2795 revealed 748 hits, suggesting (probably incorrectly) few new sources in the last few months.
Page 1:
thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.2795: - 9k [2]
patentlaw.typepad.com/ patent/2005/06/patent_reform_p.html - 21k [blog entry from June, 2005]
www.ieeeusa.org/policy/reports/PatentActof05.pdf
www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-2795 - 28k
www.publicknowledge.org/issues/hr2795 - 32k
www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1124109330603 - 39k
www.ipo.org/.../ ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm
vcexperts.com/vce/university/seminar_view.asp?id=54 - 17k - Dec 15, 2005
promotetheprogress.com/archives/patent_reform/ - 101k - Dec 14, 2005
Page 2:
www.publicknowledge.org/issues/hr2795/resource - 19k
promotetheprogress.com/archives/ 2005/06/the_ptp_patent_1.html - 32k
www.house.gov/boucher/docs/patent05.pdf
www.4ipt.com/IPMetalworks/ HR2795_Executive%20Summary_KKL.pdf
www.townsend.com/resource/hr2795.asp - 33k [2]
www.patentbaristas.com/archives/000229.php - 28k
www.smalltimes.com/document_display. cfm?section_id=76&document_id=10065 - 39k - Dec 14, 2005
www.arentfox.com/Events/content1098.pdf [2]
Page 3:
www.jonesday.com/news/news_detail.aspx?newsid=337042903 - 21k
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.R._2795 - 12k
www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h109-2795 - 104k
www.4ipt.com/IPMetalworks/ Title35-perCoalitionPrintRev_20Oct2005.pdf
ipbiz.blogspot.com/2005/08/ issue-of-continuations-in-patent.html - 44k
www.autm.net/about/AboutPubPolicy.cfm - 23k - Dec 15, 2005
releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=51784 - 14k
www.gbpatent2.com/patent_law_reform.htm - 79k
www.cio.com/blog_view.html?CID=10211
www.inventorsvoice.com/2005_ patent_legislation/patent_issues.html
Of newcomers to first three pages, the ieee hit is merely a pdf of the bill.
The Wikipedia entry says:
The Patent Reform Act of 2005 (also known as the "bill H.R. 2795") is U.S. patent legislation proposed in the Congress of the United States. Texas Republican Congressman Lamar S. Smith introduced the Act on 8 June 2005 [1]. Smith called the Act "the most comprehensive change to U.S. patent law since Congress passed the 1952 Patent Act." The Act would delete the "best mode" requirement from ยง112 of the Patent Act, as well as provide for a new system of contesting patents.
The wikipedia entry does not mention the provision on injunctions, which was the most contentious part of the bill, and debate over which blocked further action. The wikipedia entry does not mention the inequitable conduct provision and alludes to first-to-file only by reference to Simon, Dave L., "The First-to-File Provisions of the Patent Reform Act of 2005 Violate the Constitution's Intellectual Property Clause" (2005).
In general, as to the results of the google search, one will not find hits for scholarly discussion of H.R. 2795 in the first three pages. Also, one wonders why the number of hits for this search has remained at about 700 for months.
[Dec. 19, 2005 at about 6:30pm]
Page 1:
thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.2795: - 9k [2]
patentlaw.typepad.com/ patent/2005/06/patent_reform_p.html - 21k [blog entry from June, 2005]
www.ieeeusa.org/policy/reports/PatentActof05.pdf
www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h109-2795 - 28k
www.publicknowledge.org/issues/hr2795 - 32k
www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1124109330603 - 39k
www.ipo.org/.../ ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm
vcexperts.com/vce/university/seminar_view.asp?id=54 - 17k - Dec 15, 2005
promotetheprogress.com/archives/patent_reform/ - 101k - Dec 14, 2005
Page 2:
www.publicknowledge.org/issues/hr2795/resource - 19k
promotetheprogress.com/archives/ 2005/06/the_ptp_patent_1.html - 32k
www.house.gov/boucher/docs/patent05.pdf
www.4ipt.com/IPMetalworks/ HR2795_Executive%20Summary_KKL.pdf
www.townsend.com/resource/hr2795.asp - 33k [2]
www.patentbaristas.com/archives/000229.php - 28k
www.smalltimes.com/document_display. cfm?section_id=76&document_id=10065 - 39k - Dec 14, 2005
www.arentfox.com/Events/content1098.pdf [2]
Page 3:
www.jonesday.com/news/news_detail.aspx?newsid=337042903 - 21k
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.R._2795 - 12k
www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h109-2795 - 104k
www.4ipt.com/IPMetalworks/ Title35-perCoalitionPrintRev_20Oct2005.pdf
ipbiz.blogspot.com/2005/08/ issue-of-continuations-in-patent.html - 44k
www.autm.net/about/AboutPubPolicy.cfm - 23k - Dec 15, 2005
releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=51784 - 14k
www.gbpatent2.com/patent_law_reform.htm - 79k
www.cio.com/blog_view.html?CID=10211
www.inventorsvoice.com/2005_ patent_legislation/patent_issues.html
Of newcomers to first three pages, the ieee hit is merely a pdf of the bill.
The Wikipedia entry says:
The Patent Reform Act of 2005 (also known as the "bill H.R. 2795") is U.S. patent legislation proposed in the Congress of the United States. Texas Republican Congressman Lamar S. Smith introduced the Act on 8 June 2005 [1]. Smith called the Act "the most comprehensive change to U.S. patent law since Congress passed the 1952 Patent Act." The Act would delete the "best mode" requirement from ยง112 of the Patent Act, as well as provide for a new system of contesting patents.
The wikipedia entry does not mention the provision on injunctions, which was the most contentious part of the bill, and debate over which blocked further action. The wikipedia entry does not mention the inequitable conduct provision and alludes to first-to-file only by reference to Simon, Dave L., "The First-to-File Provisions of the Patent Reform Act of 2005 Violate the Constitution's Intellectual Property Clause" (2005).
In general, as to the results of the google search, one will not find hits for scholarly discussion of H.R. 2795 in the first three pages. Also, one wonders why the number of hits for this search has remained at about 700 for months.
[Dec. 19, 2005 at about 6:30pm]
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 3:38 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home