District court claim construction reversed in Mattox
We have another claim construction reversed in the non-precedential Mattor decision.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 8:50 PM
Wednesday, May 25, 2005
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- CAFC finds obviousness in In re Harris
- Chisum: reforming patent law reform
- Presenting fantasy as fact
- Marxism in Texas?
- Law review article on patent trolls
- Common sense in obviousness: Lee, 277 F.3d 1338
- In their haste to prepare the amicus brief for KSR...
- Tri-Vision Electronics sues Best Buy
- C&E News wrong on open access journals
- New Microsoft patent obvious?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home