CAFC finds obviousness in In re Harris
Further undercutting the brief of the 24 law professors, the CAFC affirmed another finding of obviousness in In re Harris and Wahl.
The case concerns ranges, and explains Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325 (CAFC 2003).
This decision also cites In re Dillon, 919 F.2d 688 (CAFC 1990)[en banc].
The amicus brief of the 24 law professors concerns the case KSR International v. Teleflex.
The case concerns ranges, and explains Peterson, 315 F.3d 1325 (CAFC 2003).
This decision also cites In re Dillon, 919 F.2d 688 (CAFC 1990)[en banc].
The amicus brief of the 24 law professors concerns the case KSR International v. Teleflex.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 8:45 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home