Pages

▼
Thursday, June 08, 2023

CAFC does secondary considerations in Yita v. MacNeil

›
The coutccome: MacNeil IP LLC is the assignee of two U.S. patents, Nos. 8,382,186 and 8,833,834, that were the subject of decisions by the...
Thursday, April 13, 2023

CAFC does trademarks

›
The outcome Charger Ventures LLC appeals from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision that denied registration of Charger’s trademark S...
Wednesday, April 12, 2023

Sanderling loses at CAFC

›
The outcome" Sanderling Management Ltd. (“Sanderling”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of Sanderling’s patent infringement...

Sequoia v. Dell: mixed decision

›
The outcome: Sequoia Technology, LLC appeals from a stipulated judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 6,718,436 foll...
Tuesday, April 11, 2023

Arbutus case affirmed. Inherent anticipation found.

›
The outcome: Appellant Arbutus Biopharma Corporation appeals a final written decision in an inter partes proceeding of the Patent Trial and...
Sunday, April 09, 2023

A Civil War national holiday? Not on April 9.

›
Steve Phillips wrote an article in the Guardian titled: The American civil war ended on this day. It should be a national holiday, which ar...

"Fake news" isn't new

›
In a Google search for "sermon walking," one can find the following: Reporters and city officials gathered at a Chicago railroad ...
Saturday, April 01, 2023

The ITC and RAI prevail in appeal to the CAFC

›
The outcome RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (collectively “Reynolds”) filed a ...

Judge Newman dissents in Roku case

›
The outcome: Roku, Inc. appeals the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s final written decision holding that claims 1, 3, 5, and 7 of U.S. Pate...
Monday, March 20, 2023

Hantz software; claims not asserted are not part of judgment

›
The conclusion: Because, in view of the foregoing, we agree that the operative complaint asserted infringement of only claims 1 and 31–33 o...