The patent quality debate re-arising???

Within a post by David W. Jones at The Hill:


Now, patent quality rarely gets the attention it deserves, so Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) should be commended for addressing it at a hearing this week. It’s the high-tech industry's hope that the hearing makes clear that instead of lowering the bar, we need to apply existing standards more rigorously to improve patent quality.

What is “quality?” It’s simple: Good patents satisfy the requirements of the Patent Act – that the invention be new, disclosed with specificity and clarity, and appropriate subject matter. Bad patents do not and were erroneously issued by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO).



link: https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/467980-how-to-fix-the-patent-quality-crisis

**Patent quality. "It's simple" ???

http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2010/10/jaffelerner-live-on-in-12-yale-jl-tech.html

http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/05/michel-on-jaffelerner.html?m=0

https://www.thecre.com/quality/2006/20060401_quality.htm