CAFC in Skyhawke continues the ordinary rule counseling against prevailing party appeals

The CAFC observed:


SkyHawke points us
to no authority to suggest that Congress intended the use
of “dissatisfied with” in conjunction with “final decision”
to broaden the appeal rights from Board decisions to
include those of prevailing parties who are merely dissatisfied
with the Board’s reasoning.



link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/opinions-orders/16-1325.Motion_Panel_Order.7-13-2016.1.PDF