Judge Stark invalidates two IV patents under 101 on April 22
The memorandum opinion includes an interesting discussion of evidentiary burdens.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 6:43 AM
Saturday, April 25, 2015
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- The Dr. Oz response
- Vizio lists its victories over patent trolls
- IPR petition of Kaspersky denied in IPR2015-00178
- District court claim construction reversed in INFO...
- Info-Hold scores partial victory over Muzak at CAFC
- Hybrid photosynthesis to make biofuel, chemicals
- Who files inter partes review actions at the USPTO?
- IPRs can be filed against small companies
- Written opinion for PCT/US2012/056063 shows one ca...
- Kyle Bass files two more IPRs against drug patents...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home