Judge Newman dissents in Kenju v. Lupin
Judge Newman found the cited prior art to teach away from the invention.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 9:38 PM
Saturday, March 21, 2015
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- The US was number one in PCT filings in 2014
- Plagiarism issue at Illinois newspaper
- Hedge funds and patents
- Article in Science urges caution over CRISPR techn...
- A123 and electric cars
- WSJ article on FTC investigation of Google
- Gantz/Bier paper on CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenic chain re...
- Can one patent a recipe?
- Making Cyanobacteria industrially useful
- AT&T suffers loss at CAFC because of late filing
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home