Newegg decision saves Victoria's Secret
The CAFC reversed ED Texas in view of Newegg in Soverain v. Victoria's Secret.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 11:18 AM
Thursday, February 12, 2015
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- CAFC addresses collateral estoppel in United Acces...
- Roy Curtiss of Arizona State honored for biofuel work
- Possible plagiarism at Mic
- "Many patents are never turned into products"
- 2015 Innovation Act to be copy of 2013 bill?
- Forbes post gets it wrong on CAFC Cuozzo decision
- GEN mentions possible withdrawal of patent applica...
- Brian Williams switching with Jon Stewart?
- Plagiarism issue in "green jobs" matter in Oregon
- Behrendt et al. report first example of Chl f-supp...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home