"The beauty of a blog post"
I’m sure others may have suggested similar reforms, and the beauty of a blog post is I don’t need to check and see. I think this study tends to justify the suggestions made by me and anyone else.
Sort of like a patent applicant does not have to conduct a review
of prior art.
But it usually is more efficient not to find one
has re-invented the wheel.
The topic on written description was Quillen/Webster and the burden
on the USPTO of continuing applications.
Recall 88 JPTOS 1068.