Pro se appellant Albecker loses at CAFC

Things looked bad for pro se appellant Albecker:

The district court adopted Albecker’s proposed construc-
tion of “top cushion.”

Albecker now appears to argue that
the district court somehow applied that construction
incorrectly. But Albecker fails to articulate that supposed error
or how it affects the noninfringement ruling. As
such this argument is unpersuasive, as are his other
remaining arguments.



http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-1318.Opinion.8-5-2014.1.PDF