Eplus v. Lawson
The dissent in Eplus v Lawson is of significant interest.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 7:41 PM
Thursday, July 31, 2014
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Apple suffers setback over Siri in patent case in ...
- Washington Times on paralegal issue at USPTO
- Blogging of material in court records: can public...
- As Beats goes after Chinese counterfeiters, Bose g...
- Boston Globe expounds on plagiarism
- Chinese companies to enter rare earth magnet area ...
- CBS Sunday Morning on July 27, 2014; cover story o...
- Who found the lionfish in Florida rivers?
- Benny Johnson terminated by BuzzFeed for plagiaris...
- Major plagiarism scandal brewing as to Senator Joh...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home