Octane, Highmark cases
Note post at Inside Counsel, Octane, Highmark cases to impact future of fee shifting
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 3:27 AM
Friday, May 09, 2014
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- How would the Bass/Tuschl dispute be resolved unde...
- The recusals by Judge Rader
- Amazon's US 8,676,056
- GE wins wind turbine inventorship case: "without c...
- Roslin Institute loses Dolly the Sheep case at CAFC
- The CAFC tackles indefiniteness in In re Packard
- "High patent grant rate" fable resurrected
- "60 Minutes" does 90+ on May 4
- CBS Sunday Morning on May 4, 2014
- GE Lighting v. AgiLight: introduced evidence becom...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home