Mixed result in Ex parte GRIESELHUBER
Ex parte GRIESELHUBER
The bottom line result in the case handled by Cooley:
We affirm the rejection of claims 6, 17, and 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based on Schachter and Horowitz. Claims 9, 24, 27, 35, and 38 fall with claims 6, 17, and 37. See 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii).
We affirm the rejection of claims 11, 29, and 39 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) based on Schachter, Horowitz, and Hartog, because Appellants rely solely on their argument with regard to claim 6 (App. Br. 9-10), which was not persuasive.
We reverse the rejection of claims 7, 8, 10, 12-16, 18, 25, 26, 28, 30- 34, and 36.
The bottom line result in the case handled by Cooley:
We affirm the rejection of claims 6, 17, and 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) based on Schachter and Horowitz. Claims 9, 24, 27, 35, and 38 fall with claims 6, 17, and 37. See 37 C.F.R. § 41.37(c)(1)(vii).
We affirm the rejection of claims 11, 29, and 39 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) based on Schachter, Horowitz, and Hartog, because Appellants rely solely on their argument with regard to claim 6 (App. Br. 9-10), which was not persuasive.
We reverse the rejection of claims 7, 8, 10, 12-16, 18, 25, 26, 28, 30- 34, and 36.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 10:16 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home