In re Payne on arguments of counsel
Ex parte Lin discusses "arguments of counsel." (Payne, Greenfield, Pearson)
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 9:28 PM
Wednesday, January 29, 2014
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Can an intermediate product anticipate?
- Lovin cited as to "naked assertions"
- Ex parte Dick on secondary considerations
- Inventorship dispute sparks lawsuit involving the ...
- Judge Whyte in ND Cal gets bizarre Joseph v NASA case
- CAFC in Chaganti: We read this as a statement tha...
- REALTIME DATA, LLC (doing business as IXO) loses a...
- "60 Minutes" on January 26, 2014
- "We Are Everyone"
- CAFC affirms 101 rejection in Smartgene
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home