PTAB affirms in part in Kurzweil
There was mixed decision in Ex parte Kurzweil with appellant represented by Fish & Richardson.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 10:09 AM
Saturday, November 30, 2013
There was mixed decision in Ex parte Kurzweil with appellant represented by Fish & Richardson.
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- CAFC analyzes claim limitation "essentially free o...
- Scientific content of an article versus publicatio...
- A claim element to "storing methanol"
- PTAB addresses issue of amending to "consisting of...
- Appellant wins in Ex parte Stout
- PTAB cites new ground of rejection under 35 USC 101
- Timorous statement in specification fails written ...
- Examiner affirmed in Ex parte VAN LIESHOUT
- Suppository goes no where
- Concerning Scripps work on lipids in algae
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home