Appellant wins at PTAB in WACHTFOGEL

The appellant wins in Ex parte WACHTFOGEL


Appellants raise several arguments
in response to the rejection,
including that one of ordinary skill in
the art would not have been motivated
by Koza to modify the teachings of Schn
eier such that the location of the
random number generator is within a subs
criber unit rather than the Central
Management Computer.
See
App. Br. 9-16.
We agree. First, as Appellants
contend, the Examiner’s reliance on
Koza as providing a reason prompting one
of ordinary skill in the art to
modify the location of the random number
generator within a subscriber unit
is misplaced.