Issue of availability of a reference in Re-exam appeal for US 7,840,678
Appellant contends that 3-DNS is not available as prior art because it “has not been established as being publicly available before the priority date of the ‘678 patent.”
(...)
Based upon a number of findings, the Examiner concludes that the totality of the evidence shows that 3-DNS was published more than one year before the critical date.
PTAB affirms the examiner on a preponderance of the evidence standard.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home