General Motors loses at PTAB on re-hearing request
From Ex parte Watkins
We also agreed with the Examiner (Ans. 14 and 18), and continue to
do so, that “deactivating” does not requires that the vehicle telematics device
be entirely disable from receiving any communication, as disclosed in the
Specification. See Request 2-3. Limitations appearing in the specification
but not recited in the claim are not read into the claim. E-Pass Techs., Inc. v.
3Com Corp., 343 F.3d 1364, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
We also agreed with the Examiner (Ans. 14 and 18), and continue to
do so, that “deactivating” does not requires that the vehicle telematics device
be entirely disable from receiving any communication, as disclosed in the
Specification. See Request 2-3. Limitations appearing in the specification
but not recited in the claim are not read into the claim. E-Pass Techs., Inc. v.
3Com Corp., 343 F.3d 1364, 1369 (Fed. Cir. 2003).
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 9:01 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home