Rejections affirmed in re-exam 95/000,538

From the case:

Since we have affirmed the rejections of claims 1, 3
-
5, 9, 16, 19, 20,
22, and 23 that relied upon Boyles, Rivest, Fielding, and A
nderson, it is
unnecessary for us to reach the additional rejections of those claims relying
on different references.
See In re Swanson
, 540 F.3d 1368, 1374 (Fed. Cir.
2008);
see also
Linear Tech. Corp. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n
, 566 F.3d 1049,
1069 n.11 (Fed
. Cir. 2009).


link: http://e-foia.uspto.gov/Foia/ReterivePdf?system=BPAI&flNm=fd2013003525-04-11-2013-1