Ex parte Greenstein does 35 USC 112 P 6
The case Ex parte Greenstein touches on issues under 112 P 6, and cites Johnston v. IVAC, 885 F.2d 1574, 1580 (CAFC 1989).
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 9:33 AM
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Rick Frenkel prevails at CAFC
- Method for conducting electronic meeting found obv...
- PTAB in Toomey: "any art recognized need can prov...
- Patent tips from "Genetic Engineering and and Biot...
- Sousa, Zappa, and intellectual property law
- Appellant prevails in Ex parte Belanoff on obvious...
- Untaught claim element allows Woods to prevail on ...
- In re Best issues discussed in Ex parte Colburn
- "Articulated reasoning" discussed in Ex parte Moffatt
- Mixed decision in Ex parte Field
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home