Obviousness reversed in Ex parte Iguchi
In Ex parte Iguchi , page 418 of KSR is cited to sustain a REVERSAL of an obviousness rejection:
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 8:28 AM
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- "Trademark protection in color"
- Drabe case turns on the meaning of "linear"
- A "working lumen" must be capable of working
- PTAB invokes KSR in Ex parte Keimel
- The meaning of determining
- Requestor prevails in inter partes re-exam 95/001,311
- Matt Damon mentions the most life-saving invention...
- In re Hood invokes KSR
- RCEs and appeals
- Examiner reversed in Ex parte Kissel
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home