Inadequate Examiner Answer in Ex parte Heynemann
See Ex parte Heynemann wherein the Board cites to Atlas Powder.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 10:54 AM
Thursday, February 07, 2013
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- The Board discusses negative limitations in Ex par...
- Mixed decision in Accent v. Leggett
- ARKEMA prevails over Honeywell in HFO-1234yf case
- Historical error in movie Lincoln?
- "Let's Make a Deal" problem
- "Face the Nation" does football on February 3, 2013
- CBS Sunday Morning on February 3, 2013
- Innovation in football
- KSR: prior art elements acting in established fun...
- Obviousness affirmed in Ex parte Yoshihara
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home