Product-by-process in Ex parte Yen
Ex parte Yen discusses product by process issues, and cites In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695 (CAFC 1985) and In re Marosi, 710 F.2d 799.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 8:48 AM
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Ex parte Yen discusses product by process issues, and cites In re Thorpe, 777 F.2d 695 (CAFC 1985) and In re Marosi, 710 F.2d 799.
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- KSR cited to affirm obviousness in CLAUS-HERZ
- Appellant Coleman wins obviousness reversal in foo...
- No unexpected results
- Limits to the use of common knowledge
- Inadvertent error
- Finding a different solution is not teaching away
- Mere attorney argument fails at the Board
- KSR invoked to defeat Samsung in Ex parte Yoon
- Jail time for copyists?
- A123 goes to China
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home