Board gives examiner advice in Ex parte Hochsmann
Ex parte Braeken, 54 USPq2d 1110 (BPAI 1999) , is cited in Ex parte Hochsmann .
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 4:21 PM
Friday, January 25, 2013
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Scientific explanation lacking in Ex parte NAGAZUMI
- Board reaches back to in Ex parte Rogers to 1876 case
- KSR defeats appellant in Ex parte INGRAM
- Trinidad government succeeds in re-exam of "steel ...
- CADC overturns EPA's cellulosic biofuel mandate
- CAFC in Hall v. Bed Bath and Beyond mainly reverse...
- Adverse possession in Boca Raton?
- "Person of Interest" theme in real life
- Inescapably indefinite under 112 P 2
- Non-functional descriptive material in OKAMOTO
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home