Intellectual property news affecting business and everyday life
Friday, December 21, 2012
Board cites no cases in affirmance in Ex parte Yoo
The Board affirmed the Examiner in Ex parte Yoo . There were rejections for anticipation and obviousness, and the Board cited no cases generally and did not cite KSR specifically.
The application in question was 11/600,059 and the technology involved LEDs. McDermott, Will was the law firm.
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted
in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home