CAFC notes distinction between copyright and patent jurisdiction in "Steven Brown" case
See Steven Brown v. Suburban Life Publishing for a brief discussion of 28 USC 1295 and 1631.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 7:44 AM
Wednesday, May 02, 2012
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- NCIS: LA--Touch of Death
- NCIS: Playing with Fire
- Prostitutes advertising on Twitter
- Pa Make Loa Hawaii Five-O brings in NCIS: LA team...
- Apple prevails over Zapmedia at the CAFC
- Season ending episode on April 29 for "The Good Wife"
- "60 Minutes" on CIA interrogation techniques on Ap...
- CBS Sunday Morning on April 29, 2012
- The Doug Lynch phantom Ph.D. affair at the Univers...
- Biofuels Digest on the Gevo / Butamax patent war o...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home