ITC rules that Apple does NOT infringe S3 patents
The full ITC disagreed with an initial ruling by an ALJ, and found that Apple did not infringe any of the asserted patents of S3.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 9:19 AM
Sunday, November 27, 2011
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Trademark dispute over "Eat More Kale"
- CBS Sunday Morning on November 27, 2011
- Something to look forward to at the new Patent Tri...
- Plagiarism excuse: only a "hectic and uncoordinat...
- On California's CIRM
- Just like fee diversion?
- Life under AIA
- Nothing new on "the umbrella man" of Nov. 22, 1963
- Federal gov help for small biotech filing foreign ...
- Apple's US 8,064,685: 3D object recognition
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home