“The ratio decidendi of the decision can stand legal scrutiny sans references to the articles plagiarized"

Following criticism of Supreme Court Justice del Castillo, there has been a backlash, including text:

“The ratio decidendi of the decision can stand legal scrutiny sans references to the articles plagiarized. The alleged plagiarism uploaded in the internet constitute direct contempt or contempt in facie curiae, a violation of the lawyers oath and a transgression of the Code of Professional Responsibility for which the person(s)/responsible must be made accountable," [ Manuel Lazaro] said.

Also

Law School Condemns Supreme Court