US government use of US patents
In Hornback v US, the CAFC discusses issues with the Invention Secrecy
Act, 35 U.S.C. § 183 and with 28 U.S.C. § 1498.
***See articles by LBE:
Where have you gone, Richard K. Lyon?, Int. Prop. Today, p. 20 (Dec. 2001) (discussing patent issues with CIPRO during the anthrax scare)
The Impact of World War I on Present Day Patent Issues, Int. Prop. Today p. 35 (Feb. 2005).
***See also
Adam Mossoff, PATENTS AS CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVATE PROPERTY: THE HISTORICAL PROTECTION OF PATENTS UNDER THE TAKINGS CLAUSE, 87 B.U.L. Rev. 689 (2007)
***See also
Crater Corp. v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 255 F.3d 1361, 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Exclusive jurisdiction for the Court of Claims has been established since 1918. 40 Stat. 705 (1918).
Act, 35 U.S.C. § 183 and with 28 U.S.C. § 1498.
***See articles by LBE:
Where have you gone, Richard K. Lyon?, Int. Prop. Today, p. 20 (Dec. 2001) (discussing patent issues with CIPRO during the anthrax scare)
The Impact of World War I on Present Day Patent Issues, Int. Prop. Today p. 35 (Feb. 2005).
***See also
Adam Mossoff, PATENTS AS CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVATE PROPERTY: THE HISTORICAL PROTECTION OF PATENTS UNDER THE TAKINGS CLAUSE, 87 B.U.L. Rev. 689 (2007)
***See also
Crater Corp. v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 255 F.3d 1361, 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Exclusive jurisdiction for the Court of Claims has been established since 1918. 40 Stat. 705 (1918).
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 5:02 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home