Obama mentions innovation in "union' speech, but not patents
In the state of the union speech on Jan 27, 2010, President Obama noted of innovation:
Next, we need to encourage American innovation. Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history — an investment that could lead to the world's cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy. You can see the results of last year's investments in clean energy — in the North Carolina company that will create 1,200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries, or in the California business that will put a thousand people to work making solar panels.
But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.
(...)
That's the leadership that we are providing — engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We're working through the G-20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. We're working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science and education and innovation. We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change. We're helping developing countries to feed themselves and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS. And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bioterrorism or an infectious disease — a plan that will counter threats at home and strengthen public health abroad.
It is interesting that the President found work with Muslim communities on innovation of greater significance than the impact of patent office problems on innovation within the United States.
Biofuels was mentioned in the section noted above, but the attention-grabber may have been "new" nuclear
But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.
One of the biggest laugh lines was: I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change.
** from Roger L. Simon at pajamas:
Meanwhile, with AGW now “settled science,” Gore was able to find and campaign for a solution to the problem. That solution turned out to be the trading of “carbon credits,” a system which entailed the setting up of carbon exchanges across the globe that would make many people rich, very rich, to the tune of billions of dollars, including Mr. Gore. The former vice-president would become wealthy beyond his wildest dreams through promulgating a scientific theory that would save humanity from itself. No narcissist could possibly ask for more.
Also More Dodgy Citations in the Nobel-Winning IPCC Report
**John F. Harris wrote of the State of the Union:
Less charitably, the address could be interpreted as the work of a president who is desperately improvising by touching every political erogenous zone he and his advisers can think of.
Under either judgment, however, it was inescapable that his 69-minute speech — for all the rush of words and policy ideas — was a document of downsized ambitions for a downsized moment in his presidency.
If so, then one infers that the problems at the US Patent Office are not a "political erogenous zone" that occurs to either the President or his advisors.
Of Joff Wild and "where the outrage is" [ It also means that any future complaints about USPTO performance are going to sound extremely hollow. ], one observes that the President is not "on the case," and any future protestations otherwise will indeed sound hollow.
Also, is it too much to ask Vice-President Biden to keep his eyes open for a mere 69 minute speech:
**See also
http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/08/gold-plating-again.html
***Of Obama's trashing the Supreme Court in the SOTU
Next, we need to encourage American innovation. Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history — an investment that could lead to the world's cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy. You can see the results of last year's investments in clean energy — in the North Carolina company that will create 1,200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries, or in the California business that will put a thousand people to work making solar panels.
But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.
(...)
That's the leadership that we are providing — engagement that advances the common security and prosperity of all people. We're working through the G-20 to sustain a lasting global recovery. We're working with Muslim communities around the world to promote science and education and innovation. We have gone from a bystander to a leader in the fight against climate change. We're helping developing countries to feed themselves and continuing the fight against HIV/AIDS. And we are launching a new initiative that will give us the capacity to respond faster and more effectively to bioterrorism or an infectious disease — a plan that will counter threats at home and strengthen public health abroad.
It is interesting that the President found work with Muslim communities on innovation of greater significance than the impact of patent office problems on innovation within the United States.
Biofuels was mentioned in the section noted above, but the attention-grabber may have been "new" nuclear
But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.
One of the biggest laugh lines was: I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change.
** from Roger L. Simon at pajamas:
Meanwhile, with AGW now “settled science,” Gore was able to find and campaign for a solution to the problem. That solution turned out to be the trading of “carbon credits,” a system which entailed the setting up of carbon exchanges across the globe that would make many people rich, very rich, to the tune of billions of dollars, including Mr. Gore. The former vice-president would become wealthy beyond his wildest dreams through promulgating a scientific theory that would save humanity from itself. No narcissist could possibly ask for more.
Also More Dodgy Citations in the Nobel-Winning IPCC Report
**John F. Harris wrote of the State of the Union:
Less charitably, the address could be interpreted as the work of a president who is desperately improvising by touching every political erogenous zone he and his advisers can think of.
Under either judgment, however, it was inescapable that his 69-minute speech — for all the rush of words and policy ideas — was a document of downsized ambitions for a downsized moment in his presidency.
If so, then one infers that the problems at the US Patent Office are not a "political erogenous zone" that occurs to either the President or his advisors.
Of Joff Wild and "where the outrage is" [ It also means that any future complaints about USPTO performance are going to sound extremely hollow. ], one observes that the President is not "on the case," and any future protestations otherwise will indeed sound hollow.
Also, is it too much to ask Vice-President Biden to keep his eyes open for a mere 69 minute speech:
**See also
http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/08/gold-plating-again.html
***Of Obama's trashing the Supreme Court in the SOTU
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 4:41 AM
1 Comments:
And then there is that minor detail about budget freezes for all Federal agencies except those involved in making war.
In other words, we're all in favor of "innovation" as long as it is the inventors who pay for the USPTO budgetary shortfall and as long as Congress gets to keep siphoning off some of that money. Why heck, milking the cash cow (the USPTO) is "innovation" all in and of itself! We are already innovating our way toward that shining city on the hill.
Post a Comment
<< Home