The BPAI decision in Gutta relating to Bilski
The "12:01 Tuesday" blog draws attention to the precedential BPAI decision on 35 USC 101 contained in Ex parte Gutta.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 7:07 AM
Friday, December 25, 2009
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- "It's a Wonderful Life"
- Microsoft smoked at CAFC in i4i/Word case
- Plagiarism vs. aliasing
- NLJ on patent reform
- Mylan sued by Schering over Simvastatin
- Derivative plagiarism doesn't fly
- Microsoft's 20090309891: truth in avataring?
- On securing Ben Nelson's vote
- On labeling someone an expert in intellectual prop...
- Expert witness failure
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home